Skip to content
fr
All demonstrations
Constructed scenario35 objectsT−1:00 → T+42:00

Diversion after a hydraulic failure: the captain's escalation

The captain is PM, the first officer PF. Shortened routing, three interventions by the captain, two almost identical answers from the PF.

Talk about your training
Step 1 of 10: A constructed scenario, a failure handled
PHASE chart: Diversion after a hydraulic failure: the captain's escalation
DescentDescentApproachApproachHoldHoldPF: cognitive overloadPF: locked onto the intercept in progressPF: approach briefing, descent under wayPF: descend, slow down, configure at oncePF: intercept strategy maintainedCPT (PM), step 1: hold suggestedCPT (PM): speed then lateral deviations calledCPT (PM), step 2: "we're not ready"PF: "yeah yeah, ok", no actionCPT (PM), step 3: "No. We're holding."PF: "ok, ok", intercept abandonedCrew: tasks put back in sequencePF: vertical regained manually, late LOCPF: AP OFF, continues manuallyDeceleration, CONF, LD recomputedCPT (PM): CONF 2 selectedBriefing: no braking strategy or go-around criteriaPF: direct routing acceptedInsufficient deceleration, CONF delayedPF: CPT (PM) callouts left unansweredPF: intercept continued without LOC captureHigh and fast: 220 kt, CONF 1, above VFE CONF 23,000 ft, 205 kt, CONF 1, off courseSpeed below 200 ktHYD degraded: limited CONF, higher VAPP/LDATC: priority, direct routing offeredATC: vectors to the holdAirport C: 3,200 m runway, good weatherT+16:00T+18:00T+22:00T+24:00T+26:00Direct routing acceptedDirect routing accepted3,000 ft, 205 kt, LOC overshot3,000 ft, 205 kt, LOC overshotStep 3: hold decidedStep 3T+19:30